AUGMENTED REALITY APPLICATION FOR CHILDREN PICTORIAL DICTIONARY
Keywords:
augmented reality, education, pictorial dictionary, interactive learningAbstract
The existing method of learning for young children, particularly through traditional pictorial dictionaries, can be dull and non-interactive, leading to a lack of engagement and motivation in early education. Additionally, children today are digital natives who have high expectations for interactive learning experiences, making conventional teaching methods less effective. To address this issue, this project aims to develop an Augmented Reality (AR) application for a Children’s Pictorial Dictionary on mobile devices. This application allows users, especially children, to scan images in the pictorial dictionary and view interactive 3D models, enhancing their understanding of objects through rotation and manipulation. The app also includes pronunciation guides with audio support to help children learn correct pronunciations. The ADDIE methodology, which consists of analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation phases, is applied in developing this application. A questionnaire was distributed among UNISEL students and other respondents, gathering feedback from 41 participants via Google Forms and WhatsApp. The results indicate that most respondents agree that incorporating AR into education significantly enhances children's interest in learning. Furthermore, the majority found AR suitable for pictorial dictionaries, as multimedia elements like graphics, animations, text, and audio keep children engaged. This study highlights the potential of AR technology in modernizing preschool education by making learning more immersive, interactive, and effective.
References
Amin, D., & Govilkar, S. (2015). Comparative study of augmented reality SDKs. International Journal on Computational Science & Applications, 5(1), 11-26. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijcsa.2015.5102
Bistaman, I. N. M., Idrus, S. Z. S., & Rashid, S. A. (2018). The use of augmented reality technology for primary school education in Perlis, Malaysia. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1019(1), 012064.
Experts, D. (2019). Study guide for CTET paper 2 (Class 6–8 teachers) social studies/social science with past questions (4th ed.). Repro Books Limited.
Javornik, A. (2016). Augmented reality: Research agenda for studying the impact of its media characteristics on consumer behaviour. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 30, 252-261.
Jung, T., Tom Dieck, M. C., Lee, H., & Chung, N. (2016). Effects of virtual reality and augmented reality on visitor experiences in museums. In A. Inversini & R. Schegg (Eds.), Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2016 (pp. 45-58). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28231-2_45
Krevelen, D. W. F. V., & Poelman, R. (2010). A survey of augmented reality technologies, applications, and limitations. The International Journal of Virtual Reality, 9(2), 1-20.
Mi, M., Wu, W., Qiu, M., Zhang, Y., Wu, L., & Li, J. (2016). Use of mobile devices to access resources among health professions students: A systematic review. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 35(1), 64-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2016.1117290
O’Shea, P. M., & Elliott, J. B. (2016). Augmented reality in education: An exploration and analysis of currently available educational apps. In C. Allison, L. Morgado, J. Pirker, D. Beck, J. Richter, & C. Gütl (Eds.), Immersive Learning Research Network: iLRN 2016 (Vol. 621, pp. 12-23). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41769-1_12
Oyekan, J., Prabhu, V., Tiwari, A., Baskaran, V., Burgess, M., & McNally, R. (2017). Remote real-time collaboration through synchronous exchange of digitised human–workpiece interactions. Future Generation Computer Systems, 67, 83-93.
Quintero, J., Baldiris, S., Rubira, R., Cerón, J., & Velez, G. (2019). Augmented reality in educational inclusion: A systematic review on the last decade. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1835. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01835
Raja, F. U., & Najmonnisa. (2018). Comparing traditional teaching methods and experiential teaching methods using experimental research. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 5(2), 276-288. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/jeed.v5n2.276
Scholz, J., & Smith, A. N. (2016). Augmented reality: Designing immersive experiences that maximize consumer engagement. Business Horizons, 59(2), 149-161.
Tom Dieck, M. C., & Jung, T. (2015). A theoretical model of mobile augmented reality acceptance in urban heritage tourism. Current Issues in Tourism, 18(2), 107-121. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2015.1070801
Waddell, J. (2015). The role of technology in the educational process. Michigan State University. Retrieved from https://education.msu.edu/green-and-write/2015/the-role-of-technology-in-the-educational-process/
Wang, T. (2019). Research on interactive teaching model of courses in five areas of preschool education. 2019 International Conference on Reform, Technology, Psychology in Education (ICRTPE 2019), 986-990.
Yuen, S., & Gallayanee, Y. (2011). Augmented reality: An overview and five directions for AR in education. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 119(4), 119-140.
Zarzuela, M. M., Pernas, F. J. D., Calzón, S. D., Ortega, D. G., & Rodríguez, M. A. (2013). Educational tourism through a virtual reality platform. 2013 International Conference on Virtual and Augmented Reality in Education. Procedia Computer Science, 25, 382-388.
Published
Issue
Section
License
All materials contained within this journal are protected by Intellectual Property Corporation of Malaysia, Copyright Act 1987 and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published, or
broadcast without the prior, express written permission of Centre for Graduate Studies, Universiti Selangor, Malaysia. You may not alter or remove any copyright or other notice from copies of this content.
